Squarely in the category of “that government governs best which governs least”: a proposed law (yes, LAW) introduced yesterday that would require (yes, REQUIRE) North Carolina college students to perform specific community service in order to get their diplomas.
According to the News & Observer story, “Tutoring rule proposed,”
Those seeking a bachelor’s degree in the state’s public and private colleges and universities would be required to spend 20 hours a semester tutoring or mentoring students in public elementary, middle or high schools if legislation introduced by Senate Majority Leader Tony Rand becomes law.
The proposed legislation is Senate Bill 2079, the “Eve Carson/Abhijit Mahato Community Service Program,” dated May 28, 2008. The text of the bill states,
The Board of Governors shall establish a community service program for baccalaureate degree candidates enrolled in the University System…. Under this program, students shall provide mentoring and tutoring services for a minimum of 20 hours per semester to public school-aged children across the State through school programs, faith-based programs, or other service programs…. Participation in this program shall be a requirement for any baccalaureate degree awarded after January 1, 2012.
So here’s a State Senator, Fayetteville Democrat Rand, who proposes to “honor” two slain students by requiring — in other words, FORCING — every other student in the state to perform community service in their names. And not only that, the law would require them to perform service for which they may or may not have any aptitude or desire: the program gives them no choice in the manner or method of their service, but would force them to work with public school children. The N&O said Rand believes this program will “instill a sense of community and responsibility in college students.”
It should instill a sense of outrage in college students. It’s one thing to encourage students to serve others at a time and place of their own choosing, but to force them into a particular type of community servitude in order to appease the legislature’s sense of what they should be doing? Student organizations across the state should mount rapid and vocal opposition to this proposal.
Furthermore, as if Rand’s proposal isn’t far-reaching enough, it actually goes beyond students in state schools to include every undergraduate: “The state’s private colleges and universities would have to impose the same requirement if they wanted to continue participating in two financial aid programs that the state provides to North Carolinians attending those schools.” Note that the students receiving the aid are not mentioned, but the schools: therefore, students receiving no aid from the state whatsoever would be subject to the same requirement.
This is a bad idea, and should be shouted down from the rooftops of every dormitory to the floor of the legislature. Not because community service is bad, but because lawmakers should not be trying to legislate it. If a college decides to require community service as a graduation requirement, students have the choice to go to another college if they don’t want to meet the requirement. If the state requires community service, students won’t have that same choice.
And since this proposed law mandates — requires — what would normally be acts of charity, what other ramifications does that present?
* First, it means that the community service is no longer voluntary, but compulsory. That may seem a small distinction, but what other compulsory service might the legislature mandate? Would our leaders require community service of all of us, and specify what it must be?
* Second, it means that those who don’t participate are by definition lawbreakers — and that the state would punish them by withholding the degrees they’ve otherwise earned.
* Third, it treats students as pools of free labor available to meet whatever pressing or passing need strikes the legislative fancy, when their primary purpose should be concentrating on their studies and learning the skills that will carry them with confidence into the future.
Good intentions, remember, pave the road to Hell. And politicians are full of good intentions.
___
The NC General Assembly web site includes this page on Rand, with contact information. Give him a call, send him an e-mail, tell him this is a bad idea.
by
Thanks again, everybody. Keep spreading the word, and call in your opinion — whichever direction you think this should go.
Wow. I think you hit it dead on. Good intentions, too prescriptive. Thanks for the note about this.
Alex.
Having received my degree from Midwestern State University, Texas history was in the mix (shrugs) – I chalked it up to “one of those things needed that are likely useless”.
Wouldn’t this, as well as Rand’s overly narrow focus, be tossed into the thick of state’s rights?
I’m with you on this 100%. If my internet connection weren’t being all flaky I would already have added my message to legislator Rand to yours. This is not an idea that can be fixed — it’s just plain bad.
I suffered through a similar bit of legislative activism in Texas — they had a law (since repealed) that you had to pass six undergraduate credits in Texas history to earn any degree from any Texas institution. I was there for a Ph.D., so my advisor signed me up for the course. I went to all the lectures, but I didn’t take it seriously, and I almost failed it. (The prof let me know that there were copies of all probable exam questions available for advance study, and I crammed and passed.)
When will legislators figure out that education is best left to educators?
–Allen
Thanks for the comments, y’all. Janice, I always appreciate your kind words.
Scott, I’m not against encouraging service, I’m against mandating it and specifying it by type. (As for conscription, let’s table that topic for another day … or you can start a thread in the forum about it.)
alas, I need typing tutoring – consription should read conscription
s. pangburn
Can’t say I disagree with a community service requirement as part of a college degree requirement, but then again, I’ve always advocated mandatory consription (Armed Forces or some form of civil service), but back to the subject. Not everyone is an effective tutor, or car washer, or window washer, etc.
In it’s current context, the bill should be taken back to the drawing board…..
s. pangburn
Forgot to sign the comment…Janice.
Ok, I am so opposed to this…wow…now I would be excited about it if they gave me a credit against my student loans should I choose to participate in a program of this nature or even if I just show consistent ways to “give back,” etc. Thanks for the post; I love your blogging!